Australian speech: from despicable to acceptable

Australian speech: from despicable to acceptable

A review of  There is nothing wrong with Australian speech (Damousi 2007).

Australian radio has reflected the beliefs and standards of the general public for generations. The British influence in radio broadcasting held fast in the early 1940s.

Concerns surrounding the use of the Australian accent in broadcasting were related to the pace of speech, perceived nasality, differences in local accents, and ‘uncultured’ tag that it had acquired (Damousi 2007, pp. 93-94).

In 1942 a debate raged about the ‘correct way’ for Australian radio presenters to speak (Damousi 2007, p. 92). Opinions were divided, but not conclusive. Demousi (2007, p. 95) points out that this debate ‘invariably led to considerations of the Australian national character’.

A problem faced by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) and other broadcasting stations, was that of pleasing the public. An academic from the University of Sydney supported the argument for the use of the Australian accent, classifying it as ‘acceptable’, ‘pleasant’ and no better or worse than any other form of English (ABC Weekly 1942, cited in Damousi 2007, p. 92). This view of tolerance and anti-prejudice, was quite revolutionary and added a jewel to the crown of Australia’s national identity.

Significantly, Damousi’s article captures a defining period in radio broadcasting history, in which a long-held British influence begins to give way to the Australian identity as we know it today.


References

Damousi, J 2007, ‘There is nothing wrong with Australian speech’, in Damousi, J & Deacon, D (eds) 2007, Talking and listening in the age of modernity: essays on the history of sound, e-book, pp. 92-96, Australian National University (ANU)  E Press, Canberra, ACT, available at http://press.anu.edu.au/titles/tal_citation/

Workbook: Week 2, 2a

Week 2 – 2a

The components of a great speech

Great speeches contain phrases and performances that linger through time. There are observable techniques common to each great speech throughout history.

Research, along with my own observations, has produced the following key elements:

1) The catchphrase

A catchphrase can be identified when ‘a word or expression is used repeatedly’, so that can it can easily be recalled by the listener, to impress a message in a similar manner to an advertising slogan (Merriam-Webster 2016).

Consider Martin Luther King, Jnr’s most commonly quoted ‘I have a dream’ speech, delivered on 28 August 1963 (Martin Luther King Jnr 1963, cited in American Rhetoric 2016). Rarely is the phrase ‘I have a dream’ uttered in media or otherwise, without being a reference to this famous speech.

‘I have a dream’ by Martin Luther King Jnr., 28 August 1963. 

On 4 November 2008, Barack Obama solidified his place in auditory history with his election victory speech, asserting: “Yes, we can” (Obama 2008, cited in American Rhetoric 2016).

In his victory speech, Barack Obama (2008, cited in American Rhetoric 2016) weaves a powerful story together with a strong message and closes using the catchphrase ‘yes we can’.

2) A powerful story with a message

Barack Obama tells the story of Ann Nixon Cooper, voting in Atlanta on the day of the election, braving queues, to ensure her voice was heard, even at 106 years of age (Obama 2008, cited in American Rhetoric 2016, p. 4). The following year, she passed away, leading to ‘fresh’ media coverage of the story and the message that Obama had imparted a year prior (‘Ann Nixon Cooper…dies at 107’ 2009).

3) A convincing or passionate delivery

A convincing or passionate delivery enhances the words and message being imparted.

Barack Obama’s response to the Trayvon Martin ruling (The White House 2013) is an example of a convincing verbal and non-verbal performance.

 

He speaks gently, slowly and thoughtfully, to cover a delicate matter with compassion, yet authority.

Notably, his gestures and facial expressions are serious, showing concern.  Through the use of the palms-down gesture (, he appears to be (non-verbally) placating or calming the public.

4) A significant cause

Great speeches are often historically significant, forming a bedrock for future speakers. There is no clearer example than Martin Luther King:

Martin Luther King had made his first national address in 1957, imploring Congress to allow voting rights for African-Americans, using the catchphrase ‘give us the ballot’ (King Encyclopedia 2016 [ii]). On 28 August 1963, he rallied against racial discrimination, for freedom, peace and acceptance at the close of the march ‘Washington for jobs and freedom’, culminating in his famous ‘I have a dream’ speech (King Encyclopedia 2016 [i]).

King (1963, cited in Collins & Membery 2011) asserts: “I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed”. A line from the Declaration of Independence is then quoted: ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal’ (National Archives 2016).

In his bid for equality, Martin Luther King was an advocate for a significant cause, rendering his several of his speeches ‘legendary’.

5) Engaging the audience

No speech can be great unless the audience has been captivated by it.  Engaging the audience is essential to imparting a message effectively.

Motivational speaker, Nick Vujicic (2011) provides a shining example of how to relate to and interact with an audience, in his presentation to school students, which forms part of a DVD set. The astounding factor in Nick’s presentation, is that he has no limbs, yet manages to maintain the audience’s attention, whilst also involving them in activities and games.

 

Another factor in Nick’s presentation is that he uses the lingo of the students to which he is presenting. This is important, as it bridges a potential communication gap. The students can relate to his anecdotes and his sense of humour relaxes them about his appearance.

In an incredible moment (at 6:54) Nick kicks a tennis ball with his ‘chicken drumstick’ foot, and it reaches the waiting student perfectly (Nick Vujicic 2011). Aside from being an accomplished speaker, Nick demonstrates his greatness and gob-smacking ability to overcome major setbacks in order to achieve in life.

Engaging the audience involves providing inspiration to them – evoking their deepest dreams and goals, and leading by example.

 

In conclusion, the greatest speeches throughout time possess a combination of factors that make them significant.  They use catchphrases, powerful stories, are persuasively delivered, support an important cause, and are designed to engage or involve the audience, in order to effectively impart a message.


References

‘Ann Nixon Cooper named in Obama’s victory speech dies at 107’ 2009, The New York Times, 22 December, viewed 11 April 2016, http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/23/us/politics/23cooper.html?_r=0

Collins, CT & Membery, Y 2011, ‘Ten of the greatest: inspirational speeches’, The Daily Mail, 9 February, viewed 17 April 2016, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1296226/Ten-greatest-Inspirational-speeches.html

C-SPAN 2008, President-elect Barack Obama victory speech, video, 5 November, viewed 9 April 2016,  https://youtu.be/jJfGx4G8tjo

King Encyclopedia 2016 [i], Martin Luther King Jnr. and the global freedom struggle: March on Washington for jobs and freedom, Carson, C & Stanford University (eds), viewed on 17 April 2016, http://kingencyclopedia.stanford.edu/encyclopedia/encyclopedia/enc_march_on_washington_for_jobs_and_freedom/index.html

King Encyclopedia 2016 [ii], Martin Luther King Jnr. and the global freedom struggle: Give us the ballot, Carson, C & Stanford University (eds), viewed on 17 April 2016, http://kingencyclopedia.stanford.edu/encyclopedia/documentsentry/doc_give_us_the_ballot_address_at_the_prayer_pilgrimage_for_freedom/

King, ML, Jnr. 1963, Martin Luther King Jnr: I have a dream, cited in American Rhetoric 2016, viewed 9 April 2016, http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/mlkihaveadream.htm

Merriam-Webster 2016, Catchphrase, viewed 11 April 2016, http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/catchphrase

National Archives 2016, The Charters of Freedom: Declaration of Independence – a transcription, viewed on 17 April 2016, http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/declaration_transcript.html

Nick Vujicic 2011, DVD part 1/11, video, 30 April, viewed 15 April 2016, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snDQe3tWwRQ&feature=related

Obama, B 2008,  Barack Obama: President elect victory speech, cited in American Rhetoric 2016, viewed 9 April 2016, http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/

The White House 2013, President Obama speaks on Trayvon Martin, video, 19 July, viewed 9 April 2016, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHBdZWbncXI&feature=youtu.be

 

 

 

Workbook: Week 2, 1a

Week 2 – Activity 1

What makes a speaking voice ‘professional’?

A common scenario depicting the difference between a professional speaker and a layperson, is as follows: a news presenter introduces a topic and briefly interviews a member of the general public.

The art of the news presenter is a carefully developed skill. Radio and television stations seek well-trained presenters, who suit their brand. Courses are provided through organisations such as Commercial Radio Australia (2014), up to Bachelor and Graduate Diploma level.

News presenting rarely includes only ‘reading’ and ‘speaking’.  More often, it involves specific journalistic skills in identifying, compiling stories and interviewing people, as well as understanding marketing, public relations and business.

Presenting, whether as a business guru, television or radio broadcaster, entrepreneur or other speaker, requires know-how in the appropriate genre.

A program about world events will require a personality and voice reflective of the content of the show. A live late night talk-show will require someone with pizzazz and comical talent, who can keep the ball rolling, in order to entertain audiences.

The sound of the voice and style of delivery are vital components in defining the professional speaking voice.

Returning to the first concept of a news presenter and a layperson, one is professionally trained and the other is not a trained ‘speaker’.

A layperson speaking in response to a question asked by a presenter, will be focused upon the content of their answer and in expressing their feelings. It is unlikely that they would have carefully planned their response with techniques such as persuasion, repetition or planned emphasis. (The exception to this idea is seen in political figures, top business people and other trained speakers.)

Professional speakers have refined skills in voice production, pronunciation and articulation and intonation.


 

References

Commercial Radio Australia 2014, Courses & training, viewed 9 April 2016, http://www.commercialradio.com.au/training/courses-training